SCOTT v. TATE
SCOTT v. TATE
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
KEITH ALAN SCOTT,
Plaintiff,
v. CASE NO. 5:19cv59-MCR/MJF
JOHN TATE,
Defendant.
_______________________________/
O R D E R
This cause comes on for consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation dated May 1, 2019. ECF No. 8. Plaintiff was furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and was afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title
28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). After reviewing any timely objections to the Recommendation, the Court has determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 8, is ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this Order.
Page 1 of 2 2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Younger v. Harris,
401 U.S. 37(1971).
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of May 2019.
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Reference
- Status
- Unknown