Marlowe v. Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company

United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

Marlowe v. Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

IRA MARLOWE and MELANIE MARLOWE,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No.: 2:18-cv-245-FtM-38MRM

IRONSHORE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant. / ORDER1 Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”). (Doc. 60). No party objected, and the time to do so passed. A district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.”

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1); see also Williams v. Wainwright,

681 F.2d 732, 732

(11th Cir. 1982). Without a specific objection, the judge need not review factual findings de novo.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1); see also Garvey v. Vaughn,

993 F.2d 776

, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993). But the district court reviews legal conclusions de novo, even without an objection. Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry.,

37 F.3d 603, 604

(11th Cir. 1994). After a careful, complete, and independent examination of the file, the Court accepts and adopts Judge McCoy’s R&R in full.

1 Disclaimer: Documents hyperlinked to CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By using hyperlinks, the Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide, nor does it have any agreements with them. The Court is also not responsible for a hyperlink’s availability and functionality, and a failed hyperlink does not affect this Order. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 60) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and the findings incorporated herein. 2. Plaintiffs Motion to Vacate and/or Modify the Appraisal Award (Doc. 58) is DENIED. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 13th day of February, 2020.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies: All Parties of Record

Reference

Status
Unknown