Franco-Rey v. Orange County Sheriff's Office

United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

Franco-Rey v. Orange County Sheriff's Office

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

KARINA FRANCO-REY,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 6:20-cv-1232-Orl-37LRH

ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, ET AL.,

Defendants.

ORDER Plaintiff moved to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 6 (“IFP Motion”).) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman recommends denying the IFP Motion and dismissing Plaintiff’s complaint (Doc. 1) without prejudice for failing to comply with the procedural rules or state a factual basis giving rise to a substantive claim. (Doc. 7 (“R&R”).) Plaintiff did not object to the R&R, and the time for doing so has now passed. So the Court has examined the R&R only for clear error. See Wiand v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 8:12-cv-557-T-27EAJ,

2016 WL 355490

, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Jan 28, 2016); see also Macort v. Prem, Inc.,

208 F. App’x 781, 784

(11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: -1- 1. U.S. Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 7) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of this Order. 2. Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 6) is DENIED. 3. Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 4. By Thursday, November 12, 2020 Plaintiff may file an amended complaint that addresses the deficiencies identified in the R&R (Doc. 7). Failure to do so may result in the closure of this action without further notice. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on October 29, 2020.

i] / py wl ROY B. DALTON JR: United States District Judge

Copies to: Pro Se Party

-2-

Reference

Status
Unknown