Hernandez Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

Hernandez Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

MAYRA HERNANDEZ RODRIGUEZ,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 6:20-cv-110-Orl-37DCI

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

ORDER In this social security appeal, Plaintiff seeks review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) decision to deny her disability benefits and supplemental income payments. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff argues the Administrative Law Judge erred by failing to apply the correct legal standards to one of her doctor’s opinion. (Doc. 18, pp. 12–23.) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick recommends affirming the Commissioner’s decision. (Doc. 19 (“R&R”).) No party objected to the R&R, and the time for doing so has passed. Absent objection, the Court has examined the R&R only for clear error. See Wiand v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 8:12-cv-557-T-27EAJ,

2016 WL 355490

, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 28, 2016); see also Macort v. Prem, Inc.,

208 F. App’x 781, 784

(11th Cir. 2006). Finding no such error, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety. It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: -1- 1. US. Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of this Order. 2. The Commissioner’s final decision is AFFIRMED. 3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security and against Plaintiff Mayra Hernandez Rodriguez and to close this case. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on December 23, 2020.

a vf | f ie Miah “ROY B. DALTON JR’ United States District Judge

Copies to: Counsel of Record

-2-

Reference

Status
Unknown