Cascario v. Monroe Detention Facility
Cascario v. Monroe Detention Facility
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case No. 4:20-cv-10109-KMM
NICHOLAS SCOTT CASCARIO,
Plaintiff, v.
DEPUTY JEFFERSON, et al.,
Defendants. /
ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon pro se Plaintiff Nicholas Scott Cascario’s (“Plaintiff”) Complaint pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983. (“Compl.”) (ECF No. 1). The Court referred the matter to the Honorable Lisette M. Reid, United States Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Petition be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (“R&R”) (ECF No. 6). Plaintiff did not file objections and the time to do so has passed. The matter is now ripe for review. As set forth below, the Court ADOPTS the R&R. The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). In the Complaint, Plaintiff alleges that he was handcuffed by Deputy Jefferson and his unnamed partner and escorted to the barbershop room at the Monroe County Detention Center (“MCDC”) where Plaintiff was confined as a pre-trial detainee. Compl. at 2. Plaintiff alleges he was then punched in the head and placed in a “turtle suit,” and those actions constituted unlawful use of force.
Id.Plaintiff seeks $150,000 in damages and requests that the officers be fired and prevented from working in any other facility.
Id.Plaintiff was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) (ECF No. 5) and, accordingly, was subject to the screening provisions of
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)G)—-Giil). As set forth in the R&R, Magistrate Judge Reid finds that Plaintiff has failed to state a viable § 1983 claim against the Defendants warranting dismissal of the Complaint. R&R at 7. Specifically, Magistrate Judge Reid finds that Plaintiff has failed to allege specific facts showing that the amount of force used was excessive or that Plaintiff sustained any injuries. /d. Further, Magistrate Judge Reid finds that the Complaint fails to provide the date on which the alleged attack occurred and the name of the second officer involved. Jd. Accordingly, Magistrate Judge Reid recommends dismissal of the Complaint. Jd. at 8. This Court agrees. Accordingly, UPON CONSIDERATION of the Complaint, the R&R, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Magistrate Judge Reid’s R&R (ECF No. 6) is ADOPTED and Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. It is further ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 15(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of the matter for failure to prosecute and failure to obey court orders. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Lewis v. Fla. Dep’t of Corr.,
739 F. App’x 585, 586 (11th Cir. 2018). DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 27th_ day of October, 2020.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
c: All counsel of record
Reference
- Status
- Unknown