Batten v. Commissioner of Social Security
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
ASHLY MARIE BATTEN,
Plaintiff, v. Case No. 6:20-cv-101-Orl-37DCI COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
ORDER
In this social security appeal, Plaintiff seeks review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) decision to deny her disability benefits and supplemental income payments. (Doc. 1.) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick recommends affirming the Commissioner’s decision. (Doc. 29 (“R&R”).)
No party objected to the R&R, and the time for doing so has passed. Absent objection, the Court has examined the R&R only for clear error. See Wiand v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 8:12-cv-557-T-27EAJ, 2016 WL 355490, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 28, 2016); see also Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding no such error, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety.
It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1. U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 29) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of this Order.
2. The Commissioner’s final decision is AFFIRMED.
3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security and against Plaintiff Ashly Marie Batten and to close this case.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on January 5, 2021. bl,
Mi Ald. mall ROY B. DALTON JR!
United States District Judge Copies to:
Counsel of Record
2.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.