United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, 2021

United States v. Hall

United States v. Hall
United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida · Decided March 15, 2021
United States v. Hall

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:20-cv-870-JLB-NPM JEREMIAH HALL, Defendant.

ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Application for Entry of Clerk’s Default Against Jeremiah Hall (Doc. 8). Plaintiff United States of America filed the instant suit to reduce to judgment certain unpaid federal income tax liabilities. (Doc. 1).

Defendant Jeremiah Hall has not responded to the Complaint, and now Plaintiff requests the Court enter a clerk’s default against Defendant. (Doc. 8). No response was filed to the motion and the response time has lapsed. For the reasons discussed below, the Court grants the motion.

“When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party’s default.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a); see also M.D. Fla R. 1.10(b). Before directing the clerk to enter a default, however, the Court must determine whether Plaintiff properly effected service of process, for which Plaintiff bears the burden of proof. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l); Chambers v. Halsted Fin.

Servs., LLC, No. 2:13-cv-809-FtM-38, 2014 WL 3721209, *1 (M.D. Fla. July 28, 2014); Zamperla, Inc. v. S.B.F. S.R.L., No. 6:13-cv-1811-Orl-37, 2014 WL 1400641, *1 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 10, 2014).

To serve an individual within a judicial district of the United States, Rule 4 allows for personal service by “delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to the individual personally.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(2)(A); see also Fla. Stat. § 48.031(1)(a). On January 26, 2021, the process server placed the summons and Complaint “in a clearly visible place at least six feet away from [Defendant]” in accordance with social distancing requirements and “advised [Defendant] to retrieve them after stepping away.” (Doc. 5). The process server also confirmed the identity of Defendant and stated that Defendant “accepted service.” (Doc. 5). Therefore, the Court finds Plaintiff properly effected service of process on Defendant.

The Defendant was properly served and failed to timely respond to the Complaint (Doc. 1). Therefore, the Court finds a clerk’s default must be entered pursuant to Rule 55(a). Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion for Clerk’s Default (Doc. 8) is GRANTED, and the Clerk is directed to enter a default against Defendant Jeremiah Hall.

Within thirty-five (35) days after entry of a clerk’s default, Plaintiff must apply for the default judgment or must file a paper identifying each unresolved issue necessary to entry of the default judgment. M.D. Fla. R. 1.10(c).

DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on March 15, 2021.

Lielabe E Aiae NICHOLAS P. MIZEL UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.