Remesar v. Commissioner of Social Security
Remesar v. Commissioner of Social Security
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION RUSELA REMESAR,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 2:20-cv-426-JLB-MRM
COMMISIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant. / ORDER The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on March 3, 2021, recommending that the Commissioner’s unopposed motion to remand under sentence four of
42 U.S.C. § 405(g) be granted. A district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In the absence of objections, a district judge is not required to review the factual findings in the report de novo, but legal conclusions are reviewed de novo even without an objection. Id.; Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co.,
37 F.3d 603, 604(11th Cir. 1994); Garvey v. Vaughn,
993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993). After an independent review of the record—and noting that the motion to remand is unopposed—the Court agrees with the R&R. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 22) is ADOPTED, and the Commissioner’s unopposed motion to remand (Doc. 21) is GRANTED. 2. The action is REMANDED for further consideration under sentence four of
42 U.S.C. § 405consistent with this Order. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment, terminate any pending deadlines, and to close the file. ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida, on March 26, 2021
PLSD ChofibwLr JOHN L. BADALAMENTI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown