United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, 2021

Prime Healthcare Services - Lehigh Acres, LLC v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.

Prime Healthcare Services - Lehigh Acres, LLC v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.
United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida · Decided July 2, 2021
Prime Healthcare Services - Lehigh Acres, LLC v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES – LEHIGH ACRES, LLC, etc.,

Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:20-cv-988-MMH-JBT BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF

FLORIDA, INC., et al.,

Defendant.

O R D E R

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 38; Report) entered by the Honorable Joel B. Toomey, United States Magistrate Judge, on June 2, 2021. In the Report, Judge Toomey recommends that Plaintiff Prime Healthcare Services’ Motion for Remand (Dkt. No. 19) be denied; Defendant Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 7) be granted to the extent that the Complaint (Dkt. No. 4) be dismissed without prejudice; and that Plaintiff be given twenty days from the Court’s Order to file an amended complaint in accordance with the finding that its claims are subject to ERISA pre-emption. See Report at 15-16.

Pursuant to Rule 72(b)(2), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure “[w]ithin 14 days after being served with a copy of [a report and recommendation], a party may serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations.” No objections to the Report have been filed, and the time for doing so has passed. Thus, the Report is ripe for consideration by the Court. The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). If no specific objections to findings of facts are filed, the district court is not required to conduct a de novo review of those findings. See Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, the district court must review legal conclusions de novo. See Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); United States v. Rice, No. 2:07-mc-8-FtM- 29SPC, 2007 WL 1428615, at * 1 (M.D. Fla. May 14, 2007).

Upon independent review of the file, and for the reasons stated in the Report, the Court will accept and adopt the legal and factual conclusions recommended by the Magistrate Judge as its opinion.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 38) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.

2. Plaintiff Prime Healthcare Services – Lehigh Acres, LLC’s Motion for Remand (Dkt. No. 19) is DENIED.

3. Defendant Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 7) is GRANTED to the extent that the Complaint (Dkt. No. 4) is DISMISSED without prejudice.

4. Plaintiff must file an amended complaint on or before July 23, 2021. DONE AND ORDERED at Jacksonville, Florida, this 2nd day of July, 2021.

MARCIA MORALES HOWARD United States District Judge Copies to:

Counsel of Record

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.