Pinkney v. Commissioner of Social Security

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 20-61285-DIMITROULEAS/SNOW KENENTH PINKNEY, Plaintiff, vs. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Andrew M. Saul, Defendant. _____________________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Amended Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 33], the Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 24], and the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow [DE 37] (the “Report”), issued on August 10, 2021. The Court has reviewed the filings and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.

The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 37] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings in the Report [DE 37] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745, 749-50 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 (1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993).

Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 37] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s analysis and conclusions.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report [DE 37] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED; 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 33] is hereby DENIED; 3. Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 24] is hereby GRANTED; and 4. The Court will enter separate final judgment.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida this 26th day of August, 2021. f a ? ; 2 (F a “4 if { FO etrsnnnnc zd a3 v Py j ‘4 ta ase □□ VILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS United States District Judge Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record