UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO.: 20-cv-25257-GAYLES/TORRES

SOLAR ECLIPSE INVESTMENT FUND VII, LLC, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

T-MOBLIE USA, INC.,

Defendant. _______________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss. [ECF No. 14]. The action was referred to Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres, pursuant to

(b)(1)(B), for a ruling on all pretrial, non-dispositive matters, and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. [ECF No. 6]. On August 16, 2021, Judge Torres issued his report recommending that the Motion to Dismiss be granted without prejudice (the “Report”). [ECF No. 48]. No party has filed objections to the Report. For the reasons that follow, the Court adopts the Report in full. DISCUSSION A district court may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation.

(b)(1). Those portions of the report and recommendation to which objection is made are accorded de novo review, if those objections “pinpoint the specific findings that the party disagrees with.” United States v. Schultz,

(11th Cir. 2009); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). Any portions of the report and recommendation to which no specific objection is made are reviewed only for clear error. Liberty Am. Ins. Grp., Inc. v. WestPoint Underwriters, L.L.C.,

(M.D. Fla. 2001); accord Macort v. Prem, Inc.,

(11th Cir. 2006). The Court has reviewed the Motion and the record and finds no clear error with the Re- port’s recommendation that the Motion to Dismiss be granted and the Complaint be dismissed without prejudice. CONCLUSION Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: (1) Judge Torres’s Report and Recommendation, [ECF No. 48], is ADOPTED in FULL; (2) Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 14] is GRANTED; and (3) The Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 5th day of September, 2021.

of DL UNITED STATES DI CT JUDGE