Yates v. Envision Glass & Aluminum
Yates v. Envision Glass & Aluminum
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
HAROLD YATES,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No.: 2:20-cv-251-SPC-MRM
ENVISION GLASS & ALUMINUM, RICHARD FRASER, and BLAKE FRASER,
Defendants. / OPINION AND ORDER1 Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy’s Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 38). Judge McCoy recommends granting the Joint Renewed Motion for Approval of FLSA Settlement Agreement (Doc. 37) and approving the revised Settlement Agreement (Doc. 37-1). No party objected, so the matter is ripe for review. After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part,” the magistrate judge’s R&R.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). In the absence
1 Disclaimer: Documents hyperlinked to CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By using hyperlinks, the Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide, nor does it have any agreements with them. The Court is also not responsible for a hyperlink’s availability and functionality, and a failed hyperlink does not affect this Order. of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review the R&R de novo. See Garvey v. Vaughn,
993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993).
Instead, when parties don’t object, a district court need only correct plain error as demanded by the interests of justice. See, e.g., Symonette v. V.A. Leasing Corp.,
648 F. App’x 787, 790(11th Cir. 2016); Thomas v. Arn,
474 U.S. 140, 150-52(1985). Plain error exists if (1) “an error occurred”; (2) “the error was
plain”; (3) “it affected substantial rights”; and (4) “not correcting the error would seriously affect the fairness of the judicial proceedings.” Farley v. Nationwide Mut. Ins.,
197 F.3d 1322, 1329 (11th Cir. 1999). After careful consideration and an independent review of the case, the
Court finds no plain error. It thus accepts and adopts the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 38) in full. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 38) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and the findings incorporated herein. 2. The Joint Renewed Motion for Approval of FLSA Settlement Agreement (Doc. 37) is GRANTED and the revised Settlement
Agreement (Doc. 37-1) is APPROVED. 3. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment, terminate any pending motions or deadlines, and close the case. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on February 8, 2022.
, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies: All Parties of Record
Reference
- Status
- Unknown