Bradford v. Ancient City Group LLC

United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

Bradford v. Ancient City Group LLC

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

JOSHUA BRADFORD,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:21-cv-513-MMH-PDB

ANCIENT CITY GROUP LLC,

Defendant.

ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Report & Recommendation (Dkt. No. 35; Report) entered by the Honorable Patricia D. Barksdale, United States Magistrate Judge, on February 15, 2022. In the Report, Judge Barksdale recommends that the Joint Motion for Approval and Dismissal (Dkt. No. 33; Motion) be granted, the settlement be approved, and the case be dismissed with prejudice. See Report at 8. The parties have no objections to the Report. See Joint Notice of Non-Objection (Dkt. No. 36). The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.”

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b). If no specific objections to findings of facts are filed, the district court is not required to conduct a de novo review of those findings. See Garvey v. Vaughn,

993 F.2d 776

, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993); see also

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1). However, the district court must review legal conclusions de novo. See Cooper-Houston v.

Southern Ry. Co.,

37 F.3d 603, 604

(11th Cir. 1994); United States v. Rice, No. 2:07-mc-8-FtM-29SPC,

2007 WL 1428615

, at * 1 (M.D. Fla. May 14, 2007). The Court has conducted an independent examination of the record in this case and a de novo review of the legal conclusions. Plaintiff filed suit

against Defendant for unpaid overtime compensation pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act,

29 U.S.C. § 201

et seq. (FLSA). See Amended Complaint & Demand for Jury Trial (Dkt. No. 18). Thereafter, the parties engaged in settlement negotiations, which resulted in a resolution of the issues and claims

raised in this case. See generally Motion. Upon review of the record, including the Report and Motion, the undersigned concludes that the settlement represents a “reasonable and fair” resolution of Plaintiff’s claims. Accordingly, the Court will accept and adopt

the Report. In light of the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. The Report & Recommendation (Dkt. No. 35) is ADOPTED as the

opinion of the Court. 2. The Joint Motion for Approval and Dismissal (Dkt. No. 33) is GRANTED. 3. For purposes of satisfying the FLSA, the settlement is APPROVED. 4, This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 5. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate any pending motions

or deadlines as moot and close this file. DONE AND ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida this 22nd day of February, 2022.

MARCIA MORALES HOWARD United States District Judge

ja Copies to: Counsel of Record

Reference

Status
Unknown