United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, 2022

Morris v. Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms

Morris v. Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms
United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida · Decided March 31, 2022
Morris v. Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

MATTHEW PAUL MORRIS, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 8:21-cv-2088-CEH-JSS BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO AND FIREARMS and UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, Defendants. ___________________________________/ ORDER THIS MATTER is before the court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Production of Records (“Motion”). (Dkt. 3.) Upon consideration, Plaintiff’s Motion is denied without prejudice.

In the Motion, Plaintiff attempts to assert a claim under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, and seeks entry of a court order requiring Defendants to comply with his request for information under FOIA. (Dkt. 3.) At this time, Plaintiff’s Motion is premature. The court previously denied a similar motion (Dkt. 1) and directed Plaintiff to file a complaint and pay the filing fee or a file a completed Application to proceed in Forma Pauperis. (Dkt. 2.)

Plaintiff paid $5.00 towards a filing fee on March 2, 2022 and subsequently filed the instant Motion. However, $5 is the filing fee for a petition of habeas corpus, not for commencing a civil action. See United States District Court, Middle District of Florida: Fees, available at https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/fees-table.

Upon review of the Motion, the undersigned finds that the Motion is intended to serve as complaint pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B). See Tannenbaum v. United States, 148 F.3d 1262, 1263 (11th Cir. 1998) (noting that pro se filings must be liberally construed). The undersigned draws no conclusion about the sufficiency of the allegations in the Complaint or the merits of Plaintiff’s claims. However, the undersigned directs the Clerk to docket the Motion as Plaintiff’s Complaint.1 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Production of Records (Dkt. 3) is DENIED without prejudice.

2. Withing sixty (60) days of the date of this order, Plaintiff shall (1) pay the remaining $397 of the civil action filing fee or file a completed Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis.

3. The Clerk shall mail Plaintiff an Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and any related forms along with a copy of this order.

1 Plaintiff is encouraged to consult the “Litigants Without Lawyers” guidelines on the court’s website, located at http://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/litigants-without-lawyers.

4. If Plaintiff fails to pay the remaining portion of the filing fee or file a completed Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis as directed, the Clerk shall return the $5 portion of the fee already paid to Plaintiff.

DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on March 31, 2022.

i as JUEKIE $. SNEED UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Party -3-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.