Robinson v. TSA Security

United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

Robinson v. TSA Security

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

SHARON A. ROBINSON,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:22-cv-255-MMH-LLL

TSA SECURITY, CLEVELAND HOPKINS AIRPORT,

Defendant. _____________________________________/

O R D E R

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 5; Report), entered by the Honorable Laura Lothman Lambert, United States Magistrate Judge, on May 26, 2022. In the Report, Judge Lambert recommends that Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) (Dkt. No. 2; Motion), construed as a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, be denied and that this case be dismissed without prejudice. See Report at 1, 6. Plaintiff has failed to file objections to the Report, and the time for doing so has now passed. The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the finding or recommendations by the magistrate judge.”

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b). If no specific

objections to findings of facts are filed, the district court is not required to conduct a de novo review of those findings. See Garvey v. Vaughn,

993 F.2d 776

, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993); see also

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1). However, the district court must review legal conclusions de novo. See Cooper-Houston v.

Southern Ry. Co.,

37 F.3d 603, 604

(11th Cir. 1994); United States v. Rice, No. 2:07-mc-8-FtM-29SPC,

2007 WL 1428615

, at *1 (M.D. Fla. May 14, 2007). Upon independent review of the file and for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Report, the Court will accept and adopt the legal and

factual conclusions recommended by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 5) is ADOPTED as the

opinion of the Court. 2. Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) (Dkt. No. 2), construed as a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, is DENIED.

3. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice. 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all pending motions and deadlines as moot and close the file. DONE AND ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida, this 15th day of June, 2022.

MARCIA MORALES HOWARD United States District Judge

ja Copies to: Counsel of Record Pro Se Party

3.

Reference

Status
Unknown