Hamrick v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

Hamrick v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

SEAN ALLEN HAMRICK,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 8:20-cv-2606-TPB-TGW

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant. ______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter is before the Court on consideration of the report and recommendation of Thomas G. Wilson, United States Magistrate Judge, entered on August 4, 2022. (Doc. 26). Judge Wilson recommends that the decision of the Commissioner denying Plaintiff’s claim for disability benefits and supplemental security income payments be affirmed. No objections have been filed and the time for objections has expired. After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1); Camby v. Davis,

718 F.2d 198, 199

(4th Cir. 1983); Williams v. Wainwright,

681 F.2d 732

(11th Cir. 1982). A district Page 1 of 3 court must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the [report and recommendation] to which an objection is made.”

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C). When no objection is filed, a court reviews the report and recommendation for clear error. Macort v. Prem, Inc.,

208 F. App’x 781, 784

(11th Cir. 2006); Nettles v. Wainwright,

677 F.2d 404, 409

(5th Cir. 1982). Upon due consideration of the record, including Judge Wilson’s report and recommendation, in conjunction with an independent examination of the file, the Court adopts the report and recommendation in all respects. The Court agrees with Judge Wilson’s detailed and well-reasoned factual findings and legal conclusions. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: (1) Judge Wilson’s report and recommendation (Doc. 26) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED and INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE into this Order for all purposes, including appellate review. (2) The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. (3) The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment in favor of the Commissioner and against Plaintiff and thereafter close the case.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida, this 12th day of

Page 2 of 3 September, 2022.

tl Loded Aa

TOM BARBER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Page 3 of 3

Reference

Status
Unknown