Burke v. United States

United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

Burke v. United States

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

EARL A. BURKE,

Movant,

v. CASE NO. 8:22-cv-1980-WFJ-AAS CRIM. CASE NO. 8:15-cr-461-WFJ-AAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent. ________________________________/

ORDER

BEFORE THE COURT is Mr. Burke’s motion under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

to vacate his sentence (cv Doc. 1) in which he contends that, given United States v. Jackson,

36 F.4th 1294

(11th Cir. 2022), his sentence was erroneously enhanced under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA).1 The § 2255 motion is a second or successive motion to vacate filed without authorization from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.2 See

28 U.S.C. § 2244

(b)(3)(A) (“Before a second or successive application

1 Under Jackson, a pre-2017 cocaine-related conviction under Florida Statutes, Section 893.13(1)(a), no longer is a “serious drug offense” for purposes of the ACCA for defendants who committed their federal felon-in-possession of a firearm offense on or after September 11, 2015. 36 F.4th at 1301–04.

2Mr. Burke’s initial § 2255 motion was denied on March 7, 2017. See Case No. 8:16-cv-2121- JDW-TBM (M.D.Fla.) (Doc. 22).

1 permitted by this section is filed in the district court, the applicant shall move in the appropriate court of appeals for an order authorizing the district court to consider the application.”). Consequently, this Court lacks jurisdiction, and the motion must be dismissed. See Farris v. United States,

333 F.3d 1211, 1216

(11th Cir. 2003); Mitchell v. United States,

2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 10401

, at *5-6 (11th Cir. June 9, 2016) (unpublished) (“[B]ecause Mitchell did not obtain our authorization before filing his successive § 2255 motion, the district court properly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction over the motion and dismissed it.”). Accordingly, the § 2255 motion to vacate (cv Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court must send Mr. Burke the Eleventh Circuit’s application form for leave to file a second or successive § 2255 motion under

28 U.S.C. § 2244

(b) and close this case. ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on September 14, 2022.

WILLIAM F. ca UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SA: sfc Copies to: Earl A. Burke, pro se Counsel of Record

Reference

Status
Unknown