Wexler v. Department of Children and Families

United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

Wexler v. Department of Children and Families

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

DAVID WAYNE GIZMO WEXLER; and LISA WEXLER,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 6:22-cv-1111-RBD-DCI

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES; TIDAL BASIN GOVERNMENT CONSULTING, LLC; RISING PHOENIX HOLDINGS CORPORATION; SPERIDIAN TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; and OUR FLORIDA,

Defendants. ____________________________________

ORDER Plaintiffs filed a pro se Complaint, alleging they experienced issues when applying for the federal Emergency Rental Assistance Program. (Docs. 7, 7-1.) Plaintiffs also moved to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 2 (“Motion”).) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick recommends denying the Motion and dismissing the Complaint without prejudice and without leave to amend for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Doc. 14 (“R&R”).) The deadline has passed and there were no objections, so the Court examines the R&R for clear error only. See Macort v. Prem, Inc.,

208 F. App’x 781, 784

(11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is due to be adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The R&R (Doc. 14) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of this Order in its entirety. 2. Plaintiff's Motion (Doc. 2) is DENIED. 3. Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 7) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and without leave to amend. 4. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on October 6, 2022.

f]

im a ROY B. DALTON JR’ United States District Judge

Copies: Pro se Plaintiffs David Wayne Gizmo Wexler and Lisa Wexler.

Reference

Status
Unknown