Wexler v. Department of Children and Families
Wexler v. Department of Children and Families
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
DAVID WAYNE GIZMO WEXLER; and LISA WEXLER,
Plaintiffs,
v. Case No. 6:22-cv-1111-RBD-DCI
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES; TIDAL BASIN GOVERNMENT CONSULTING, LLC; RISING PHOENIX HOLDINGS CORPORATION; SPERIDIAN TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; and OUR FLORIDA,
Defendants. ____________________________________
ORDER Plaintiffs filed a pro se Complaint, alleging they experienced issues when applying for the federal Emergency Rental Assistance Program. (Docs. 7, 7-1.) Plaintiffs also moved to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 2 (“Motion”).) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick recommends denying the Motion and dismissing the Complaint without prejudice and without leave to amend for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Doc. 14 (“R&R”).) The deadline has passed and there were no objections, so the Court examines the R&R for clear error only. See Macort v. Prem, Inc.,
208 F. App’x 781, 784(11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is due to be adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The R&R (Doc. 14) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of this Order in its entirety. 2. Plaintiff's Motion (Doc. 2) is DENIED. 3. Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 7) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and without leave to amend. 4. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on October 6, 2022.
f]
im a ROY B. DALTON JR’ United States District Judge
Copies: Pro se Plaintiffs David Wayne Gizmo Wexler and Lisa Wexler.
Reference
- Status
- Unknown