Pytynia v. United States, Inc.
Pytynia v. United States, Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
JANET-MONICA PYTYNIA,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No: 6:22-cv-1999-CEM-LHP
UNITED STATES, INC., DUKE ENERGY, DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, LLC and JANET YELLEN,
Defendants
ORDER TO STRIKE This cause comes before the Court on review of Plaintiff’s “Prime Creditor Claim to Right of Subrogation and Demand for Remedy/Restitution.” Doc. No. 9. Upon review, the filing is ORDERED stricken for failure to comply with the Local Rules, including Local Rule 1.08’s format requirements, Local Rule 3.01(a)’s page limitations, and Local Rule 3.01(g)’s conferral requirements. Any renewed filings must comply with all applicable rules. Plaintiff is cautioned that although she proceeds pro se, all filings in this matter must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rules of this Court, and Court Orders. See Moon v. Newsome,
863 F.2d 835, 836(11th Cir. 1989) (A pro se litigant “is subject to the relevant law and rules of court, including the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”), cert. denied,
493 U.S. 863(1989). See also Doc. No. 4. DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on December 5, 2022.
| ay □□□□ LESLIE AN PRICE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties
fy
Reference
- Status
- Unknown