Lau v. Kelly

United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

Lau v. Kelly

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

TERA BROOKE LAU,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No: 6:22-cv-2000-CEM-LHP

CHRISTOPHER KELLY,

Defendant

ORDER TO STRIKE Plaintiff, appearing pro se, has filed the above-styled motion in which she appears to be asking that the Court require Defendant to pay her attorney’s fees to litigate this matter. Doc. No. 8. Upon review, the filing contains information that should have been redacted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a), accordingly, it is hereby STRICKEN, and the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to remove the filing (Doc. No. 8) from the docket. Moreover, Plaintiff is cautioned that the filing fails to comply with the Local Rules of this Court, in particular Local Rule 3.01(a). Any future motions filed in this Court must comply with all Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rules, and Court Orders. Future non-compliant filings may be stricken or summarily denied without further notice. See also Moon v. Newsome,

863 F.2d 835, 837

(11th Cir. 1989) (stating that pro se litigants are “subject to the relevant law and rules of court, including the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”). DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on February 8, 2023.

| Ayn LESLIE AN PRICE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties

_2-

Reference

Status
Unknown