Galinis v. Humiston
Galinis v. Humiston
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
LUKE CHARLES GALINIS and MELYSSA ELLEN WELLS,
Plaintiffs,
v. Case No: 6:23-cv-1020-WWB-LHP
CHRISTOPHER HUMISTON and LORI O’BRIEN,
Defendants
ORDER This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the following motion filed herein: MOTION: MOTION FOR MISCELLANEOUS RELIEF MOTION TO SEAL DOCKET NUMBER 7 (Doc. No. 13) FILED: June 13, 2023
THEREON it is ORDERED that the motion is DENIED without prejudice. The motion fails to comply with Local Rule 1.11 and Local Rule 3.01(a). In addition, a review of Docket Entry 7 does not readily demonstrate the need to seal the information contained in that document. Any renewed motion must comply with all applicable Local Rules, Court Orders, and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Moon v. Newsome,
863 F.2d 835, 837(11th Cir. 1989) (a pro se litigant “is subject to the relevant law and rules of court, including the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”), cert. denied,
493 U.S. 863(1989).
DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on June 26, 2023.
| ay □□□□ LESLIE AN PRICE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties
_2-
Reference
- Status
- Unknown