Guggisberg v. Target Corporation
Guggisberg v. Target Corporation
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
JANICE GUGGISBERG,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No.: 2:23-cv-517-SPC-NPM
TARGET CORPORATION,
Defendant. / ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Target Corporation’s Response to the Court’s Order to Supplement the Notice of Removal. (Doc. 12). Because Target did not sufficiently show the requirements for diversity jurisdiction, the Court ordered it to supplement its notice of removal. (Doc. 10). In response, Target admits that it does not have any other information to establish the amount in controversy. The Court thus remands this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Dudley v. Eli Lilly & Co.,
778 F.3d 909, 912(11th Cir. 2014) (stating removal statutes are strictly construed with doubts resolved for remand). Accordingly, it is ORDERED: (1) This case is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Lee County, Florida. (2) The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a certified copy of this Order to the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Lee County, Florida. (3) The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate close the case. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on August 3, 2023.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies: All Parties of Record
Reference
- Status
- Unknown