Toney v. United States

United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

Toney v. United States

Trial Court Opinion

UMNIIDTEDDL ES TDAISTTERS IDCITS TORFI FCLTO CROIDURAT TAMPA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 8:22-cv-2674-SDM-TGW 8:12-cr-561-SDM-TGW TAVIS TONEY ____________________________________/

ORDER

Toney moves under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

to vacate his sentence and challenges the validity of only one of his federal convictions and sentences. Toney asserts entitlement to relief under United States v. Taylor,

142 S. Ct. 2015

(2022), which holds that attempted robbery under the Hobbs Act “does not qualify as a ‘crime of violence’” under

18 U.S.C. § 924

(c). The United States admits that Toney timely filed this action within one year of Taylor and that Taylor applies retroactively on collateral review. (Doc. 11 at 5) Toney was charged with Hobbs Act robbery (count one); brandishing a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, specifically the robbery charged in the preceding count (count two); attempted Hobbs Act robbery (count three); discharging a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, specifically, the attempted robbery charged in the preceding count (count four); and possession of a firearm by a felon (count five). In accord with his plea agreement, Toney pleaded guilty and serves sentences for the brandishing and discharging counts (counts two and four). Because the sentence for discharging a firearm (count four) is based on an attempted Hobbs Act robbery, the United States stipulates (Doc. 11 at 6) that Toney is entitled to relief because under Taylor the conviction and sentence under count four is invalid. Both Toney and the United States request a new sentencing hearing and the opportunity to present their respective positions on an appropriate sentence. (Docs. 11 at 7-8 and 24 at 2) This order resolves only the civil action; further argument about an appropriate sentence and subsequent proceedings must occur in the criminal action. The motion under

28 U.S.C. § 2555

(a) (Doc. 1) is GRANTED. The clerk must (1) enter a judgment for Toney in the civil action, (2) close the civil case, and (3) docket this order in the criminal action for an appropriate remedy under Section 2255(b). The federal defender must continue to represent Toney in the criminal action. All further proceedings will occur in the criminal action. ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on August 4, 2023.

STEVEND.MERRYDAY □□ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-

Reference

Status
Unknown