Phelps v. Kimbrell

United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

Phelps v. Kimbrell

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

STEVEN R. PHELPS,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:23-cv-301-BJD-JBT

KIMBRELL (MAINTENANCE MAN/PLUMBER),

Defendant. _________________________________

ORDER

In a one-page letter (Doc. 20), Plaintiff asks that the Court refund his filing fee in this case and another (Case No. 3:22-cv-991-MMH-JBT). Plaintiff has not filed a proper motion for this Court’s consideration. Under this Court’s Local Rules, a party seeking relief must do so through a proper motion, not a letter. M.D. Fla. R. 3.01(a), (j). “A motion must include . . . a concise statement of the precise relief requested, a statement of the basis for the request, and a legal memorandum supporting the request.” M.D. Fla. R. 3.01(a). See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(b) (“A request for a court order must be made by motion.”). Regardless of the facial insufficiency of Plaintiff’s filing, the Court is aware of no Rule that would entitle Plaintiff to a refund of the filing fee, which he paid in full, simply because his action was dismissed. On the contrary, under the United States Code, the clerk’s collection of a civil filing fee is dependent on the filing of an action, not its disposition: “The clerk . . . shall require the parties instituting any civil action... to pay a filing fee.” See

28 U.S.C. § 1914

(a) (emphasis added). District courts generally deny requests for refunds of filing fees properly collected under § 1914(a). See, e.g., Dominic v. Goldman, No. 2:21-cv-394-SPC-NPM,

2021 WL 2376704

, at *1 (M.D. Fla. June 10, 2021) (“Fee-paying litigants are not entitled to refunds simply because a

case is dismissed ... .”); Montoya v. Cap. One, N.A., No. 2:21-cv-11978,

2022 WL 957548

, at *1 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 29, 2022) (citing cases and explaining that the “Judicial Conference of the United States ‘has a longstanding policy prohibiting the refund of fees”). Accordingly, Plaintiff's request for a refund of the filing fee (Doc. 20) is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED at Jacksonville, Florida, this 11th day of October, 2023.

Zh. OW - A Aas | tA eran BRIAN/J DAVIS United States District Judge Jax-6 C: Steven R. Phelps, #830369

Reference

Status
Unknown