United States v. Joseph
United States v. Joseph
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No: 8:23-cv-1015-KKM-JSS
CHRISTEL JOSEPH,
Defendant. ___________________________________ ORDER The United States of America moves for default judgment against Christel Joseph. Mot. for Default J. (Doc. 20). The Magistrate Judge recommended that I grant the motion. R&R (Doc. 22). The fourteen-day deadline for the Parties to object to the recommendation has passed, and neither Party has objected. Nevertheless, I review the Magistrate Judge’s legal conclusions de novo. ,
37 F.3d 603, 604(11th Cir. 1994); ,
379 F. Supp. 3d 1244, 1246(M.D. Fla. 2019) (Steele, J.). After review, I conclude that default judgment against Christel Joseph is appropriate for the reasons and to the extent the Magistrate Judge stated. R&R at 4–11. Accordingly, the following is ORDERED:
1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, (Doc. 22), is ADOPTED and made a part of this Order for all purposes. 2. The United States’ Motion for Default Judgment, (Doc. 20), is
GRANTED. 3. The Clerk is directed to enter a FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of the United States and against Christel Joseph. 4. Christel Joseph is permanently enjoined from:
a. Owning or operating a tax return preparation business; b. Preparing, filing, or assisting in the preparation of filing federal tax
returns, amended returns, and other related documents and forms that he knows will result in the understatement of any tax liability or the overstatement of federal tax refunds; c. Maintaining any association with, or profiting from, a tax return
preparation business; d. Instructing, teaching, or otherwise training any person in the
preparation of federal tax returns, amended returns, and other related documents and forms; e. Engaging in any activity subject to penalty under
26 U.S.C. §§ 6694, 6695, or 6701; and f. Engaging in conduct that substantially interferes with the proper administration and enforcement of the internal revenue laws. 5. The Court will retain jurisdiction over this action for the purposes of implementing and enforcing the permanent injunction. 6. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case. ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on November 29, 2023.
athryn’ Kimball Mizelle United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown