UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION BRITTANY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, Vv. CASE NO. 8:23-cv-2537-CEH-TGW STATE OF FLORIDA, Defendant. oo ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider (Doc. 6), which the Court construes as a motion to alter or amend the order dismissing this action under Rule 59(e), Fed.R.Civ.P. “The only grounds for granting [a Rule 59] motion are newly discovered evidence or manifest errors of law or fact.” Arthur v. King,

(11th Cir. 2007) (quoting In re Kellogg,

, 1119 (11th Cir. 1999)). Plaintiff neither presents newly-discovered evidence nor demonstrates that the Court committed a manifest error of law or fact in dismissing her complaint under

(g). Thus, Plaintiff fails to provide good cause for this Court to alter or amend the order dismissing this action. Accordingly, the motion (Doc. 6) is DENIED. ORDERED in Tampa, Florida on December 6, 2023.

Chalene Sharda Wo TDA pl yl Charlene Edwards Honeywell United States District Judge Copy to: Plaintiff, pro se