GEICO Indemnity Company v. Graham
GEICO Indemnity Company v. Graham
Trial Court Opinion
ORLANDO DIVISION
GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No: 6:23-cv-985-RBD-LHP
MICAH GRAHAM and COREY MCKINNEY,
Defendants.
ORDER
After a preliminary pretrial conference with the parties, Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) with proposed case management deadlines. (Doc. 42). The parties did not object and the deadline has passed, so the Court examines the R&R for clear error only. See Macort v. Prem, Inc.,
208 F. App’x 781, 784(11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is due to be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The R&R (Doc. 42) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of this Order in its entirety. 2. The Court will delay entering the Case Management and Scheduling Order until after the discovery stay is lifted. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on December 10, uy i f ROY B. DALTON, JR. A United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown