Guarnizo v. The Chrysalis Center, Inc.
Guarnizo v. The Chrysalis Center, Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 22-60710-CIV-DIMITROULEAS
CHRISTOPHER GUARNIZO,
Plaintiff,
vs.
THE CHRYSALIS CENTER, INC.,
Defendant. ___________________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING AND APPROVING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE; DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant The Chrysalis Center, Inc. (“Defendant”)’s Motion to Dismiss (the “Motion”) [DE 18], and the February 16, 2023 Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) [DE 30]. The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 30] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings in the Report [DE 30] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger,
847 F.2d 745, 749-50(11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied,
488 U.S. 958(1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc.,
996 F.2d 1144, 1149(11th Cir. 1993). Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 30] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s analysis and conclusions. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report [DE 30] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED; 2. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [DE 30] is hereby DENIED; 3. Defendant shall file its answer on or before March 17, 2023. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 3rd day of March, 2022.
a ? ; 2 (F a | 4 . f PAV fs a3 v ty j ‘4 ta ase Af C4 KAGAN AMY MEL Cn VILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS United States District Judge
Copies furnished to: Magistrate Judge Hunt Counsel of record
Reference
- Status
- Unknown