Guarnizo v. The Chrysalis Center, Inc.

United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

Guarnizo v. The Chrysalis Center, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-60710-CIV-DIMITROULEAS

CHRISTOPHER GUARNIZO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

THE CHRYSALIS CENTER, INC.,

Defendant. ___________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING AND APPROVING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE; DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant The Chrysalis Center, Inc. (“Defendant”)’s Motion to Dismiss (the “Motion”) [DE 18], and the February 16, 2023 Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) [DE 30]. The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 30] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings in the Report [DE 30] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger,

847 F.2d 745, 749-50

(11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied,

488 U.S. 958

(1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc.,

996 F.2d 1144, 1149

(11th Cir. 1993). Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 30] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s analysis and conclusions. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report [DE 30] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED; 2. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [DE 30] is hereby DENIED; 3. Defendant shall file its answer on or before March 17, 2023. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 3rd day of March, 2022.

a ? ; 2 (F a | 4 . f PAV fs a3 v ty j ‘4 ta ase Af C4 KAGAN AMY MEL Cn VILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS United States District Judge

Copies furnished to: Magistrate Judge Hunt Counsel of record

Reference

Status
Unknown