UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 21-61758-CIV-DIMITROULEAS BTL INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware corporation,

Plaintiff,

vs.

TECHNO ESTHETICS INC., d/b/a TRUE ESTHETICS MEDSPA, a Florida corporation,

Defendant. ___________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING AND APPROVING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiff BTL’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs [DE 41] (the “Motion”) and the February 17, 20232 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt (the “Report”) [DE 46]. The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 46] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings in the Report [DE 46] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger,

(11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied,

(1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc.,

(11th Cir. 1993). Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 46] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s analysis and conclusions. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report [DE 46] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED; 2. Plaintiff BTL’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs [DE 41] is hereby GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; 3. Plaintiff is hereby awarded attorney’s fees in the amount of $46,210. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 6th day of March, 2023.

fl } “a 4 : “4 if % f ? f tne i ye Zo #4 v Paty 4 ‘4 ase Af CA MAGIA AYN GC VILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS United States District Judge Copies to: Judge Hunt Counsel of Record