UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 21-62486-CIV-SINGHAL/Valle

SEVEN LXXVII, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

PETER J. MULLINS,

Defendant. __________________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Paperless Report and Recommendation (DE [35]), issued on January 24, 2023. Therein, Magistrate Judge Valle considered Plaintiff’s Motion to Tax Costs (DE [33]) and recommended it be granted in part. The parties were given seven days to file any objections to the magistrate judge’s factual findings and recommendation. See

(b)(1); S.D. Fla. Mag. J. R. 4(b). Here, neither side filed any such objections. With no objections filed, the Court’s review of the Report and Recommendation (DE [35]) is properly limited to a de novo review of only its legal conclusions. See Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London v. PharmaTech, LLC,

, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 19, 2019) (“Legal conclusions are reviewed de novo, even in the absence of an objection.”). This Court has reviewed the entire file and record and has made a de novo review of the issues. No objections to the Report and Recommendation (DE [35]) have been filed, thus, the Court reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (DE [35]) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED as follows: 1. Plaintiff's Motion to Tax Costs (DE [33]) is GRANTED IN PART. 2. Plaintiff SEVEN LXXVII, LLC shall recover $968.00 in costs, for which let execution issue. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 5th day of April 2023. \ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies furnished to counsel of record via CM/ECF