Tynes v. FedEx Corporation

United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

Tynes v. FedEx Corporation

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FT. LAUDERDALE DIVISION

SCHCOLA TYNES,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 22-cv-60449-WPD

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION,

Defendant. ________________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant’s Bill of Costs [DE 89] (the “Motion”), and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss [DE 92] (the “Report”). The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 92] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings in the Report [DE 92] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger,

847 F.2d 745, 749-50

(11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied,

488 U.S. 958

(1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc.,

996 F.2d 1144, 1149

(11th Cir. 1993). Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 92] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s reasoning and conclusions. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report [DE 92] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED; 2. Defendant’s Motion [DE 89] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; and 3. Defendant is hereby awarded taxable costs in the amount of $3,398.50. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 13th day of April, 2023. f a ? ; 2 (F a | 4 . f PAV fs a3 v ty j ‘4 ta ase □□ C4 KAGAN AMY MEL Cn VILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS United States District Judge

cc: counsel of record Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss

Reference

Status
Unknown