Tynes v. FedEx Corporation
Tynes v. FedEx Corporation
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FT. LAUDERDALE DIVISION
SCHCOLA TYNES,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No.: 22-cv-60449-WPD
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION,
Defendant. ________________________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant’s Bill of Costs [DE 89] (the “Motion”), and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss [DE 92] (the “Report”). The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 92] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings in the Report [DE 92] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger,
847 F.2d 745, 749-50(11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied,
488 U.S. 958(1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc.,
996 F.2d 1144, 1149(11th Cir. 1993). Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 92] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s reasoning and conclusions. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report [DE 92] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED; 2. Defendant’s Motion [DE 89] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; and 3. Defendant is hereby awarded taxable costs in the amount of $3,398.50. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 13th day of April, 2023. f a ? ; 2 (F a | 4 . f PAV fs a3 v ty j ‘4 ta ase □□ C4 KAGAN AMY MEL Cn VILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS United States District Judge
cc: counsel of record Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss
Reference
- Status
- Unknown