UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 22-61705-CIV-SINGHAL

CENTRE WAY COMPANY LIMITED,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE INDIVIDUALS, PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”,

Defendants. __________________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Paperless Report and Recommendation to District Judge (DE [49]), issued on March 27, 2023. Therein, Magistrate Judge Valle considered Defendant Presentime’s Notice of Motion, Motion for Attorney’s Fees, and Supporting Memorandum of Points and Authorities (DE [46]) and recommended it be denied. The parties were given fourteen days to file any objections to the magistrate judge’s factual findings and recommendation. See

(b)(1); S.D. Fla. Mag. J. R. 4(b). Here, neither side filed any such objections. With no objections filed, the Court’s review of the Report and Recommendation (DE [49]) is properly limited to a de novo review of only its legal conclusions. See Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London v. PharmaTech, LLC,

, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 19, 2019) (“Legal conclusions are reviewed de novo, even in the absence of an objection.”). This Court has reviewed the entire file and record and has made a de novo review of the issues. No objections to the Report and Recommendation (DE [49]) have been filed, thus, the Court reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Magistrate Judge’s Paperless Report and Recommendation to District Judge (DE [49]) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. Defendant Presentime’s Notice of Motion, Motion for Attorney’s Fees, and Supporting Memorandum of Points and Authorities (DE [46]) is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 1st day of June 2023. \ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies furnished to counsel of record via CM/ECF