Toyota Lease Trust v. 310 MOTOR GROUP LLC

United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

Toyota Lease Trust v. 310 MOTOR GROUP LLC

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 23-21476-CV-WILLIAMS

TOYOTA LEASE TRUST,

Plaintiff,

v.

310 MOTOR GROUP LLC,

Defendant. /

ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid’s Report and Recommendation (DE 39) (“Report”) on Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (DE 12) (“Motion”). In the Report, Judge Reid recommends that the Motion be denied. (DE 39 at 1.) Specifically, the Report finds that Plaintiff: failed to establish that it has a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of its claims; failed to establish that it will suffer irreparable harm absent a preliminary injunction; failed to demonstrate that the threatened injury outweighs the harm the preliminary injunction would cause Defendant; and failed to establish that a preliminary injunction would serve the public interest. (See generally id.) Plaintiff filed an Objection1 to the Report. (DE 46.) The Court conducted a de novo review of the portions of the Report to which Plaintiff objected and a review of

1 The Court notes that the objections rehash arguments that were already presented to Judge Reid or simply disagree with the Report’s conclusions. However, it is well settled that an objecting party may not “submit [] papers to a district court which are nothing more than a rehashing of the same arguments and positions taken in the original papers submitted to the Magistrate Judge. Clearly, parties are not to be afforded a ‘second bite at the apple’ when they file objections to a [Report].” Marlite, Inc. v. Eckenrod,

2012 WL 3614212

, at *2 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 21, 2012) (quoting Camardo v. Gen. Motors Hourly-Rate Emps. Pension Plan,

806 F. Supp. 380, 382

(W.D.N.Y. 1992)). the remainder of the Report for clear error. Having carefully reviewed the Report, the Objection, the record, and applicable law, itis ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report (DE 39) is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (DE 12) is DENIED. The Parties are advised for a second time that they must fully comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules for the Southern District of Florida, the Court’s Practices and Procedures, and the Court’s orders, including each deadline set forth by the Court. Failure to do so may result in the imposition of sanctions. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, this 31st day of July, 2023. ran, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Page 2 of 2

Reference

Status
Unknown