Martinez v. Netflix, Inc.
Martinez v. Netflix, Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 20-cv-24328-WPD ANA MARGARITA MARTINEZ,
Plaintiff,
v.
NETFLIX, INC., ORANGE STUDIOS, S.A., and OLIVIER ASSAYAS,
Defendants.
____________________________________
ORDER ADOPTING AND APPROVING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the July 6, 2023 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis (the “Report”) [DE 164]. The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 164] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings in the Report [DE 164] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger,
847 F.2d 745, 749-50(11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied,
488 U.S. 958(1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc.,
996 F.2d 1144, 1149(11th Cir. 1993). Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 164] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s analysis and conclusions. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report [DE 164] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED; 2. The Court hereby finds that complete diversity existed among the Parties at the time this case was commenced, and that diversity jurisdiction exists; 3. Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion to Amend First Amended Complaint by Interlineation [DE 162] is hereby GRANTED; 4. The Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to return the record, as supplemented, to the Eleventh Circuit for further proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 21st day of July, 2023. a ? ; 2 (F a “t if f fe eenstntannane oe co a3 v ty j ‘4 ta ase Af VILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS United States District Judge Copies to: Judge Louis Counsel of record Circuit Clerk [23-10895]
Reference
- Status
- Unknown