UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 21-62398-CIV-ALTONAGA/Strauss

ANYI AGUILERA,

Plaintiff, vs.

JM CELL LLC, et al.,

Defendants. _______________________/ ORDER THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Defendants’ Objections [ECF No. 86] to Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss’s Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 85]. In his Report, Judge Strauss recommends the Court deny Defendants’ Motion to Vacate Judgment Pursuant to Rule 60(b)(4) and for an Evidentiary Hearing [ECF No. 77]. Having reviewed the Report, the Motion to Vacate and the entire record, and the Objections; and having made a de novo determination1 with respect to those portions of the Report to which Defendants formally objected, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 85] is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. Defendants’ Motion to Vacate Judgment Pursuant to Rule 60(b)(4) and for an Evidentiary Hearing [ECF No. 77] is DENIED.

1 “The Court need not do over every step done by a magistrate judge on which there was some objection. De novo review means review without any deference; it does not mean that a district judge must redo the case without consideration of what the magistrate judge has written.” DeJonge v. Burton, No. 1:16-cv-980,

, at *1 (W.D. Mich. Oct. 11, 2018) (quotation marks and citation omitted). CASE NO. 21-62398-CIV-ALTONAGA

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 2nd day of October, 2023.

locts UW. AE CECILIA M. ALTONAGA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ce: counsel of record