UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

ANTOINETTE CHURCHILL,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 8:21-cv-3024-NHA

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant. _____________________________/

ORDER I grant Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, brought pursuant to

(b) (Doc. 28), and award Plaintiff $19,700.68 in attorneys’ fees. On March 1, 2023, the Court entered an order reversing and remanding the Commissioner’s decision against Plaintiff, pursuant to sentence four of

(g). Doc. 23. The Clerk then entered judgment in Plaintiff’s favor (Doc. 24) and the Court awarded Plaintiff’s counsel $5,876.52 in fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). Doc. 26. On January 29, 2024, after Plaintiff’s claim was remanded to the Social Security Administration, the Administrative Law Judge entered an order finding Plaintiff was disabled as of October 2017, and was entitled to $78,802.72 in past-due benefits.1 Doc. 28- 3. Plaintiff’s counsel now seeks payment of fees in the amount of 25% of the

past due benefits ($19,700.68) pursuant to

(b). Doc. 28. Defendant has filed no opposition to Plaintiff’s request. See Doc. 31. Under

(b), when a court renders a judgment favorable to a Social Security claimant who was represented by counsel, the court may

award a reasonable fee for the representation, not to exceed twenty-five percent of the total past-due benefits won by claimant.

(b)(1)(A). The Supreme Court has instructed that, in awarding fees under

(b), a court should not use the lodestar method, but should consider the

overall reasonableness of the fee in light of the parties’ fee agreement, “the character of the representation[,] and the results the representative achieved.” Gisbrecht v. Barnhart,

(2002). And, while a plaintiff’s counsel may recover attorneys’ fees under both

(b) and the EAJA,

counsel must refund to the plaintiff the amount of the smaller fee.

In securing her representation, Plaintiff agreed with her counsel that Plaintiff would pay her 25% of any past-due benefit award counsel helped Plaintiff obtain. Doc. 28-2. In light of the agreement, the risk taken by

Plaintiff’s counsel in representing Plaintiff on a contingency basis, and the

1 Plaintiff’s benefits were subsequently reduced due to survivorship benefits Plaintiff was already receiving. results achieved, I find the requested attorney’s fees award of $19,700.68 is appropriate. However, counsel must refund to Plaintiff the $5,876.52 in attorney’s fees the Court previously awarded to her under the EAJA. Doc. 28. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's request for an award of attorney’s fees under

(b) (Doc. 28) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiffs counsel is awarded fees in the amount of $19,700.68 pursuant to

(b), but must refund to Plaintiff the $5,876.52 in attorney’s fees the Court previously awarded to Plaintiff's counsel under the EAJA. 3. The Clerk is directed to enter an amended judgment accordingly. ORDERED on April 22, 2024.

Noll Hat hdowis) NATALIE HIRT ADAMS United States Magistrate Judge