Jenkins v. United States
Jenkins v. United States
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
JARQUEL JENKINS,
Petitioner,
v. Case Nos.: 2:24-cv-609-SPC-KCD 2:19-cr-081-SPC-KCD
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent. / OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Jarquel Jenkins’ Motion Under
28 U.S.C. § 2255to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (Doc. 1).1 This is Jenkins’ second § 2255 motion. The Court denied his first on January 13, 2023. (Cr-Doc. 80). “A second or successive [§ 2255] motion must be certified as provided in section 2244 by a panel of the appropriate court of appeals[.]”
28 U.S.C. § 2255(h). Jenkins’ second motion, which is based on an intervening change in the law, is subject to the certification requirement. But Jenkins has not shown that the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals certified it. The Court will thus
1 The Court refers to documents from Case No. 2:24-cv-609-SPC-KCD as “Doc. _” and documents from Case No. 2:19-cr-081-SPC-KCD as “Cr-Doc. _.” deny it without prejudice. Jenkins may re-file the motion if certified by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY A prisoner seeking relief under § 2255 has no absolute entitlement to appeal a district court's denial of his motion.
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1). Rather, a district court must first issue a certificate of appealability (COA). “A [COA]
may issue...only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). To make such a showing, a petitioner must demonstrate that “reasonable jurists would find the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong,” Tennard
v. Dretke,
542 U.S. 274, 282(2004) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel,
529 U.S. 473, 484(2000)), or that “the issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further,” Miller–El v. Cockrell,
537 U.S. 322, 335– 36 (2003) (citations omitted). Jenkins has not made the requisite showing here
and may not have a certificate of appealability on any ground of his Motion. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: Jarquel Jenkins’ Motion Under
28 U.S.C. § 2255to Vacate, Set Aside, or
Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (Doc. 1; Cr-Doc. 81) is DENIED without prejudice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment against Jenkins, terminate any pending deadlines, and close this case. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on July 19, 2024.
ete POLSTER atthe UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
SA: FTMP-1 Copies: All Parties of Record
Reference
- Status
- Unknown