UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

JAMES CURRAN, JR,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 8:22-cv-1962-AEP

MARTIN J. O’MALLEY, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant. /

ORDER This cause comes before the Court upon Attorney Martin J. Cohen’s Motion for an Award of Attorney’s Fees Under

(b). (Doc. 17). On September 14, 2023, this Court entered an Order reversing and remanding the decision of the Commissioner under sentence four of

(g). (Doc. 13). Upon remand, the Commissioner issued a favorable decision for Plaintiff resulting in an award of disability benefits. (See Doc. 17-1). As a result of the favorable decision, Plaintiff’s counsel now seeks payment of fees in the amount of $30,620.00 pursuant to

(b). The Commissioner does not oppose the requested relief. Under

(b), when a court renders a judgment favorable to Social Security claimant who was represented before the court by counsel, the court may allow a reasonable fee for such representation, not to exceed twenty-five 406(b)(1)(A). A plaintiff’s counsel may recover attorney’s fees under both

(b) and the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”),

. Gisbrecht v. Barnhart,

(2002). The plaintiff’s attorney must, however, refund

to the plaintiff the amount of the smaller fee.

The Court previously awarded Plaintiff’s fees in the amount of $3,819.58, pursuant to the EAJA,

. (Doc. 16). The fee agreement entered into by Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s counsel states that

twenty-five percent of all retroactive benefits obtained for Plaintiff will be paid to the firm of Plaintiff’s attorney as compensation for their services. (Doc. 17-1). After the disability finding, the Social Security Administration withheld a total of $30,620.00 from Plaintiff’s past-due benefits for possible payment of attorney’s fees in federal court. (Doc. 17-1, at 3). Plaintiff’s counsel requests an award of attorney’s

fees in this amount. Upon review of the fee agreement (Doc. 17-2) and the itemization of services rendered by counsel (Doc. 17-3), the Court determines that an award of fees in the amount of $30,620.00 is reasonable and appropriate. Moreover, in light of the time spent on the case, the requested fee is not so large as to result in a windfall for Plaintiff’s counsel. See Vilkas v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No.

2:03CV687FTM-29DNF,

, at *2 (M.D. Fla. May 14, 2007) (finding reasonable a § 406(b) fee that amounted to payment of $1,121.86 per hour for attorney’s representation of plaintiff before the court). However, the fee should be reduced by $3,819.58, the amount previously awarded to Plaintiff’s counsel pursuant to the EAJA,

. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. Plaintiffs Motion for an Award of Attorney’s Fees Under

(b) (Doc. 17) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff's counsel is awarded fees in the amount of $ 26,800.42 pursuant to

(b). DONE AND ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on this 16th day of September 2024.

Pd f EK /) ae Wl 20) ANTHONY E. PORCELLI United Sfates Magistrate Judge

cc: Counsel of Record