United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, 2024

Cunningham v. Sanofi S.A.

Cunningham v. Sanofi S.A.
United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida · Decided December 16, 2024
Cunningham v. Sanofi S.A.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

BARBARA CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 8:23-cv-2472-TPB-AEP SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, et al.

Defendant. /

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter is before the Court on consideration of the amended report and recommendation of Anthony E. Porcelli, United States Magistrate Judge, entered on November 25, 2024. (Doc. 59). Judge Porcelli recommends that “Plaintiff’s Motion for Review of Clerk’s Action on Bill of Costs” (Doc. 54) be denied. No objection to the report and recommendation has been filed, and the time to object has expired.

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge’s amended report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). A district court must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the [report and recommendation] to which an objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).. When no objection is filed, a court reviews the report and recommendation for clear error. Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006); Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404, 409 (5th Cir. 1982).

Upon due consideration of the record, including Judge Porcelli’s amended report and recommendation, the Court adopts the amended report and recommendation. The Court agrees with Judge Porcelli’s detailed and well- reasoned factual findings and legal conclusions.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: (1) Judge Porcelli’s amended report and recommendation (Doc. 59) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED and INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE into this Order for all purposes, including appellate review. (2) “Plaintiffs Motion for Review of Clerk’s Action on Bill of Costs” (Doc. 54) is DENIED.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida, this 13» day of December, 2024.

VAP. Gua. -TOMBARBER — UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Page 2 of 2

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.