UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

AMANDA MARIE IMFELD,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 8:23-cv-1071-JRK

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,1

Defendant. ___ / ORDER This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Petition for EAJA Fees Pursuant to

(d) and Supporting Memorandum of Law (Doc. No. 25; collectively, “Petition”), filed November 25, 2024. In the Petition, Plaintiff seeks an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) in the amount of $9,215.01. Petition at 1.2 Plaintiff represents that Defendant does not oppose the relief requested.

.

1 Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on November 30, 2024. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn W. Colvin is substituted for Martin O’Malley as Defendant in this suit. No further action need be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act,

(g). 2 The pagination of the Petition is not continuous. Citations to the Petition follow the pagination of the Court’s electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Plaintiff’s counsel expended a total of 37.6 hours in the representation of Plaintiff before the Court: 6.6 hours by Carol Avard, 28.7 hours by Craig

Polhemus, and 2.3 hours for the preparation of the Petition.

; see also Affidavit (Doc. No. 25-1) at 18-19 (Schedule of Hours). Plaintiff requests an hourly rate of $244.62 for hours expended in 2023 and $251.54 for hours expended in 2024. Petition at 3; Affidavit (Doc. No. 25-1) at 19. Plaintiff is

seeking a higher hourly rate than the $125 specified by statute based on the increase in the cost of living since 1996, when the attorney’s fee rate was last adjusted by Congress. See

(d)(2)(A) (permitting fee awards at rates higher than $125 per hour upon the Court’s determination that cost of

living has increased). Having examined the Consumer Price Index and the representations made in the Petition, the Court concludes an increase in inflation does justify a proportionate increase in attorney’s fees.3 Plaintiff has assigned her rights to any entitlement of attorney’s fees due

under the EAJA to her counsel. Petition at 3; see Attorney Fee Contract for Social Security Benefits/SSI Fee Agreement-Federal Court (Doc. No. 25-2). Regarding the assignment, Plaintiff represents the following:

3 See U.S. Dep’t of Labor, Inflation Calculator, at http://data.bls.gov/cgi- bin/cpicalc.pl (last visited December 19, 2024). In computing the hourly rate adjustment for the cost of living increase, the Consumer Price Indexes generally used for the year in which the services were performed. See Masonry Masters, Inc. v. Nelson, 105F.3d708, 710-13(D.C. Cir. 1997); see also Gates v. Barnhart, No. 5:01-cv-148-Oc-GRJ,

(M.D. Fla. June 25, 2002) (unpublished). [After the Court issues an] Order awarding EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the Commissioner will determine whether Plaintiff owes a debt to the government. If the U.S. Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, the government will accept Plaintiffs Assignment of EAJA fees and pay fees directly to Plaintiff's counsel. Petition at 3. In light of the foregoing, it is ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's Unopposed Petition for EAJA Fees Pursuant to

(d) and Supporting Memorandum of Law (Doc. No. 25) is GRANTED. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant for attorney’s fees in the amount of $9,215.01 pursuant to

(d). 3. The Commissioner may exercise her discretion to honor Plaintiffs assignment of fees to counsel if the U.S. Department of Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a debt to the U.S. Government. DONE AND ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida on December 19, 2024.

JAMES R. KLINDT nited States Magistrate Judge

kaw Copies: Counsel of Record