United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, 2024

Morales v. Trademark Douglas, LLC

Morales v. Trademark Douglas, LLC
United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida · Decided January 19, 2024
Morales v. Trademark Douglas, LLC

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION GERARDO MORALES, and other similarly situated individuals, Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 2:23-cv-390-SPC-KCD TRADEMARK DOUGLAS, LLC, STORM ROOFING AND CONSTRUCTION LLC and ELLIS C. WESTBY, Defendants. / OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is the Parties’ Joint Motion for Settlement Approval (Doc. 50) and United States Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 51). Judge Dudek recommends granting the motion and dismissing the action as to Defendant Trademark Douglas, LLC. No party objected, so the matter is ripe for review.

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part,” the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review the Report and Recommendation de novo. See Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993). Instead, when parties don’t object, a district court need only correct plain error as demanded by the interests of justice. See, e.g., Symonette v. V.A. Leasing Corp., 648 F. App’x 787, 790 (11th Cir. 2016); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150-52 (1985). Plain error exists if (1) “an error occurred”; (2) “the error was plain”; (3) “it affected substantial rights”; and (4) “not correcting the error would seriously affect the fairness of the judicial proceedings.” Farley v. Nationwide Mut. Ins., 197 F.3d 1322, 1329 (11th Cir. 1999).

After careful consideration and an independent review of the case, the Court finds no plain error. It accepts and adopts the Report and Recommendation in full.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: 1. United States Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 51) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED, and the findings incorporated herein.

2. The Joint Motion for Settlement Approval (Doc. 50) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice as to Defendant Trademark Douglas, LLC only.

DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on January 19, 2024.

, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies: All Parties of Record

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.