UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

WESLEY MCDUFFIE,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 8:23-cv-210-MRM-JSS

MARTIN O’MALLEY, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant. /

ORDER

This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Uncontested Motion for Attorney’s Fees. (Doc. 23). By the motion, Plaintiff seeks attorney’s fees in the amount of $5,875.57 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”),

(d). On December 5, 2023, this Court entered an Order granting the Commissioner’s Motion to Remand and reversing and remanding the case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. (Doc. 21). Thereafter, the Clerk entered judgment in favor of Plaintiff. (Doc. 22). As the prevailing party, Plaintiff now requests an award of attorney’s fees. See

(d)(1)(A); cf. Shalala v. Schaefer,

(1993) (concluding that a party who wins a sentence-four remand order under

(g) is a prevailing party), superseded by rule on other grounds, Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(c)(2)(B). After issuance of an order awarding EAJA fees, the United States government. If Plaintiff has no discernable federal debt, the government will accept Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees and pay the fees directly to Plaintiff's counsel. The Commissioner does not oppose the requested relief. (Doc. 23, § 7). Additionally, Plaintiff's attorney filed an affidavit in support of the motion. (Doc. 24). Therefore, for the reasons set out in Plaintiff's motion and supported by the affidavit it is hereby ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's Uncontested Motion for Attorney’s Fees (Doc. 23) 1s GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff is awarded fees in the amount of $5,875.57. Unless the Department of Treasury determines that Plaintiff owes a federal debt, the government must pay the fees to Plaintiff's counsel in accordance with Plaintiff's assignment of fees (Doc. 24). DONE AND ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on this 3rd day of April 2024.

JA p-—~ J Lhe by PW" TZ ANTHONY E. PORCELLI United Sfates Magistrate Judge

cc: Counsel of Record