Houston Casualty Company v. Endurance Assurance Corporation
Houston Casualty Company v. Endurance Assurance Corporation
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
HOUSTON CASUALTY COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 6:22-cv-1429-RBD-LHP
ENDURANCE ASSURANCE CORPORATION; and ARMANDO MALDONADO,
Defendants. ____________________________________
ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion for Default Judgment as to Defendant Armando Maldonado. (Doc. 58 (“Motion”).) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price entered a Report and Recommendation stating that the Court should grant the Motion. (Doc. 60 (“R&R”).) The parties did not object and the time has passed, so the Court examines the R&R for clear error only. See Macort v. Prem, Inc.,
208 F. App’x 781, 784(11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is due to be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The R&R (Doc. 60) is ADOPTED AND CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order in its entirety. 2. The Motion (Doc. 58) is GRANTED. 3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter a default declaratory judgment in favor of Plaintiff Houston Casualty Company and against Defendant Armando Maldonado stating that BH Management is covered under the Endurance Policy, and Endurance has a duty to defend BH Management in the state court lawsuit, Case No. 2021-CA-008589- 0. (See Docs. 56-57.) 4. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on May 21, 2024.
ROY B. DALTON, JR. United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown