Higgins v. United States
Higgins v. United States
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
JORENY HIGGINS,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 6:23-cv-138-RBD-DCI
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant. ____________________________________
ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Amended Unopposed Motion to Approve the Settlement of Minor, TTP. (Doc. 26 (“Motion”).) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick entered a Report and Recommendation stating that the Court should grant the Motion. (Doc. 27 (“R&R”).) The parties did not object and the time has passed, so the Court examines the R&R for clear error only. See Macort v. Prem, Inc.,
208 F. App’x 781, 784(11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is due to be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The R&R (Doc. 27) is ADOPTED AND CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order in its entirety. 2. The Motion (Doc. 26) is GRANTED. 3. The Settlement (Doc. 26-1) is APPROVED. 4. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 5. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on June 6, 2024.
ROY B. DALTON, United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown