UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

STEPHANIE MICHELLE GARMON,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No: 8:24-cv-1289

MARGARET REBECCA TAYLOR,

Defendant.

ORDER THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, (Dkt. 2), which the Court construes as a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Also before the Court is Plaintiff’s Complaint. (Dkt. 1) On May 31, 2024, United States Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn issued a Report and Recommendation, (Dkt. 3), which recommended Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be denied and the Complaint be dismissed with prejudice. Upon consideration of all relevant filings, case law, and being otherwise fully advised, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and DISMISSES the Complaint with prejudice. In the Eleventh Circuit, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation after conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations.

(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright,

(11th Cir. 1982). A district judge “shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.”

(b)(1)(C). This requires

that the district judge “give fresh consideration to those issues to which specific objection has been made by a party.” Jeffrey S. v. State Bd. of Educ.,

, 512 (11th Cir. 1990) (quoting H.R. 1609, 94th Cong. § 2 (1976)). Absent specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo,

Garvey v. Vaughn,

, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations.

(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry.,

(11th Cir. 1994).

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation, in conjunction with an independent examination of the file, the Court is of the opinion the Report and Recommendation should be adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation, (Dkt. 3), is CONFIRMED and

ADOPTED as part of this Order. 2. Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, (Dkt. 2), is DENIED. 3. Plaintiff’s Complaint, (Dkt. 1), is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 4. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case.

DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, this 17th day of June 2024.

// 4 / 1 L/L MS ko MARY'S_SGRIVEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Any Unrepresented Person