Barry v. Sam's East, Inc

United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

Barry v. Sam's East, Inc

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 23-61881-CIV-DIMITROULEAS WINIFRED BARRY,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAM’S EAST, INC. d/b/a SAM’S CLUB,

Defendant. _____________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING AND APPROVING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE; DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiff Winifred Barry (“Plaintiff”)’s Motion to Strike or Exclude Expert Testimony (the “Motion”) [DE 21], and the January 26, 2024 Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) [DE 33]. The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 33] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings in the Report [DE 33] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger,

847 F.2d 745, 749-50

(11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied,

488 U.S. 958

(1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc.,

996 F.2d 1144, 1149

(11th Cir. 1993). Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 33] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s analysis and conclusions. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report [DE 33] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED; and 2. Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike or Exclude Expert Testimony [DE 21] is hereby DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 12th day of February 2024.

| n j . Piaf ff, a7 a 4 if tz ay eh “3 (AK VA A WANAKA AA ea VILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS United States District Judge Copies furnished to: Magistrate Judge Augustin-Birch Counsel of record

Reference

Status
Unknown