Sarria v. M/V Trophy

United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

Sarria v. M/V Trophy

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN ADMIRALTY □ Case No. 23-81245-CV-MIDDLEBROOKS CARLOS SARRIA and RENEE SARRIA, □

Plaintiffs, BLUE RIDGE BANK, Intervening Plaintiff, vs. M/V TROPHY, a 1984 74’ Huckins motor yacht, her boats, engines, generators, tackle, rigging, apparel, furniture, furnishings, equipment, contents and appurtenances, etc., in rem; and RICHARD MAYER, in personam ,and JOHN DOLMETSCH,, in personam, Defendants. / □ . ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Magistrate Judge William Matthewman’s Report & Recommendation, entered on March 18, 2024. (DE 53). In the Report, Judge Matthewman

recommends that I dismiss without prejudice Claimant Shelli Schmid’s Claim for lack of prosecution, approve the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice, filed on February 5, 2024 © (DE 51), and close the case. The Report sets a deadline of April 1, 2024, to object to the recommendations. No objections were filed on the record. Having reviewed the record in this case, I agree with Judge Matthewman’s recommendations, and I will adopt the Report in entirety. □ After all Parties except for Claimant Shelli Shmid attended a settlement conference with _ Judge Matthewman on January 23, 2024, Judge Matthewman notified the Court that the Parties -

had settled in full. Subsequently, Plaintiffs, Carlos Sarria and Renee Sarria, along with Defendant vessel and Defendant Richard Mayer, filed a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal. ! (DE 51). I note that the Parties’ Stipulation is not self-executing, but rather conditioned upon the Court’s reservation □ of jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Parties’ settlement agreement. Therefore, I will retain jurisdiction consistent with the terms of Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC,

677 F.3d 1272

(11th Cir. 2012). Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: (1) Judge Matthewman’s Report and Recommendation (DE 53) is ADOPTED IN □□□□ ENTIRETY. (2) Claimant Shelli Schmid’s Claim (DE 21) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of prosecution. (3) Plaintiffs Carlos Sarria and Renee Sarria’s claims against Defendants M/V Trophy □□□

Richard Mayer are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (4) The above Parties shall bear their own fees and costs. (5) Pursuant to the Parties’ request, I will reserve jurisdiction, for a period of six months, or until October 15, 2024, to enforce the terms of the Parties’ Settlement Agreement. SIGNED in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Florida, this day of April, 2024. Yili DONALD M. MIDDLEBROOKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE □ 1 Despite the Joint Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice (DE 51) only referencing Plaintiffs Carlos Sarria and Renee Sarria, Defendant M/V Trophy, and Defendant Richard Mayer, — I note that Defendant John Dolmetsch, Blue Ridge Bank, Montana Specialty Holdings II, and ~ Swiss Re Corporate Solutions America Insurance Company all appeared in some capacity at □□□ January 23, 2024, Settlement Conference. (See DE 46).

Reference

Status
Unknown