UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

CASE NO: 0:22-cv-61471-WPD

ANDREA GRAJEDA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff(s), v.

VERIFIED MOVING PROS, LLC, and DONALD LINA, individually,

Defendants. /

ORDER ADOPTING AND APPROVING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs’ Verified Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs [DE 80] (the “Motion”) and the May 2, 2024 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt (the “Report”) [DE 85]. The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 85] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings in the Report [DE 85] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger,

(11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied,

(1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc.,

(11th Cir. 1993). Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 85] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s analysis and conclusions. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report [DE 85] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED; 2. Plaintiffs’ Verified Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs [DE 80] is hereby GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; and 3. Plaintiffs are hereby awarded attorney’s fees in the amount of $87,489.75 and costs in the amount of $1,274.55. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 17th day of May, 2024. fl } “a 4 : “t jf f ? f yf Zo #4 v Paty 4 ‘4 ase Af CA KAAYAA AVY EINE VILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS United States District Judge Copies to: Magistrate Judge Hunt Counsel of Record