Bradis, Sr. v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

Bradis, Sr. v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

CATHERINE E. BRADIS, SR.,

Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 8:24-cv-2151-AAS

LELAND DUDEK,1 Commissioner of Social Security Administration,

Defendant. ______________________________________/

ORDER Catherine E. Bradis, Sr., moves for attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA),

28 U.S.C. § 2412

. (Doc. 22). The Commissioner does not oppose the motion. (Id., p. 4). Ms. Bradis requests $8,911.73 in attorney and paralegal fees. The EAJA permits awards for reasonable attorney’s fees to a prevailing party against the United States.

28 U.S.C. § 2412

. A January 14, 2025 order remanded the Commissioner’s final decision under sentence four of

42 U.S.C. Section 405

(g) for further administrative proceedings. (Doc. 19). The Clerk of Court entered judgment in favor of Ms. Bradis. (Doc. 20).

1 Leland Dudek became Acting Commissioner of Social Security on February 16, 2025. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d), Leland Dudek is substituted as the defendant in this action. See

28 U.S.C. § 405

(g). The Commissioner does not contest the following: Ms. Bradis is the prevailing party; the Commissioner’s position was not substantially justified;

and Ms. Bradis’s attorney’s fees request is reasonable. A court should grant a Social Security claimant’s request for attorney’s fees when it is unopposed. See Jones v. Colvin, No. 8:13-CV-2900-T-33AEP,

2015 WL 7721334

(M.D. Fla. Nov. 30, 2015) (awarding unopposed attorney’s fees request). Thus, Ms. Bradis is

entitled to $8,911.73 in attorney’s fees. Attorney’s fees awarded to a claimant under the EAJA can be offset to satisfy the claimant’s pre-existing debt to the United States. Astrue v. Ratliff,

560 U.S. 586, 589

(2010). Following an order, the United States Department of

the Treasury will determine whether Ms. Bradis owes a debt to the United States. Ms. Bradis assigned her rights to EAJA fees to her attorney. (Doc. 22- 2). So, if Ms. Bradis has no federal debt, the United States will accept her assignment of EAJA fees and pay the fees directly to counsel.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Ms. Bradis’s motion for attorney’s fees under the EAJA (Doc. 22) is GRANTED. Ms. Bradis is awarded $8,911.73 in attorney’s fees. ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on April 2, 2025. Aranda. Aynoth Saag AMANDA ARNOLD SANSONE United States Magistrate Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown