Lee v. Charlotte Correctional Institution

United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

Lee v. Charlotte Correctional Institution

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

DANIEL T. LEE,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 2:25-cv-265-SPC-NPM

RICKY DIXON, CAPTAIN GORMAN, OFFICER STRICKLAND, and WARDEN PANE,

Defendant. / OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff Daniel T. Lee’s handwritten complaint (Doc. 1). The complaint does not comply with Rules of Federal Procedure 8 and 10. Rule 8 requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” And Rule 10 requires a party to “state its claims or defenses in numbered paragraphs, each limited as far as practicable to a single set of circumstances.” This rule is important. It enables defendants to respond to each factual claim, which alerts the Court and the parties to the factual claims in dispute. Lee’s complaint presents an unbroken narrative describing the use of force by Officer Strickland. This narrative structure does not give the defendants a fair opportunity to respond to each of Lee’s factual claims. There is another problem with Lee’s complaint. It appears Lee included three defendants solely due to their supervisory roles. Lee does not allege that

Florida Department of Corrections Secretary Ricky Dixon, Warden Pane, or Captain Gorman participated in a violation of his constitutional rights. It is well settled in the Eleventh Circuit that supervisory officials are not liable under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

for the acts of their subordinates. Keith v. DeKalb

Cnty., Ga.,

749 F.3d 1034, 1047

(11th Cir. 2014). Lee may only sue officials who personally contributed to a constitutional harm. For these reasons, the Court will dismiss Lee’s complaint and allow him to amend on the attached civil-rights complaint form. The amended complaint

must comply with Rules 8 and 10 and include as defendants only those individuals whose conduct harmed Lee. Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

Plaintiff Daniel T. Lee’s handwritten complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to send Lee a civil-rights complaint form with this order. Lee may file an amended complaint on the form (with additional pages if needed) by April 24, 2025. Otherwise, the

Court will enter judgment and dismiss this case. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on April 3, 2025.

ites POLSTER atta UNITED STATES DISTRICTJUDGE

SA: FTMP-1 Copies: All Parties of Record

Reference

Status
Unknown